When suing for long-term disability benefits, an important choice for your lawyer is whether to file the lawsuit in federal court or state court. New York State provides an interesting contrast for the purpose of evaluating this choice:
In civil cases in New York State, a civil jury consists of six people—only five have to agree to meet the unanimity requirement.
In federal court, complete unanimity is required—all jurors (usually 6 but sometimes more) have to agree whether or not the policyholder is totally disabled or disabled within the meaning of the policy.
Needing unanimity can be important for both sides, but often more so for the policyholder.
New York’s Court of Appeals—its highest court—has ruled that surveillance materials must be turned over to a policyholder in a lawsuit against the insurance company prior to that policyholder testifying in their deposition.
This means that the policyholder can see and evaluate the insurance company’s evidence prior to testifying—this allows preparation time and an early opportunity to explain the circumstances surrounding any surveillance.
The opposite is true in federal court. Surveillance materials are only exchanged after the policy holder testifies in the deposition. Thus, the policyholder is operating with a blindfold if there is surveillance involved in the lawsuit.
Ordinarily, in New York State Court, experts do not need to testify before a long-term disability litigation goes to trial. In addition, they ordinarily do not need to be disclosed by the plaintiff until after discovery is over and, often, shortly before trial. By disclosing the experts right before the trial, there is the added element of surprise. Without any pre-trial disclosure or deposition testimony by experts, significant expense is saved.
Conversely, experts in federal court must be disclosed during ordinary discovery, and the insurance company has the right to take their depositions (which most companies will do). As a result, the process is more time-consuming and expensive, and the element of surprise is eliminated.
In long-term disability lawsuits, there can be significant differences between choosing to sue in state versus federal court. It is important for the policy holder’s attorney to evaluate whether a lawsuit can be filed in either state or federal court, considering the specifics facts of your case, along with the practical and procedural realities that exist in a state where your lawsuit will be filed.
Please contact us with any questions or comments.
Evan S. Schwartz
Founder of Schwartz Law
We as a society are not prepared to deal with catastrophic illness, and although I was smart enough to have taken out a Long-term Disability policy in my thirties, the
Desperate and devastated with everything to lose, I put my life in the hands of Evan and Michail on faith. In my heart I always believed they would deliver, and
During the most trying part of my life, Schwartz Law’s attorneys were fighting for my life. I was physically just barely up on my own two feet, with a diagnosis
A company made an error in how they sold me my long-term disability insurance policy and they offered me a lump sum settlement. I did not fully understand the offer
My claim was denied by my insurance company. My medical condition wasn’t understood by my physicians. My first attorney gave me terrible advice. My family faced financial ruin without the
The Chanin Building, 122 East 42nd Street, Suite 725, New York, New York 10168
Toll Free: (800) 745-1755
Phone: (212) 608-5445
666 Old Country Road, Ninth Floor, Garden City, New York 11530
Toll Free: (800) 745-1755
Phone: (516) 745-1122
Fax: (516) 745-0844